Topic
Every decision we've filed under Civil.
The Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a prisoner's medical neglect claims but vacated the dismissal of his excessive force allegations. The court held that the district court erred by relying on a defendant's self-serving report and a video to evaluate the sufficiency of the complaint under Rule 12(b)(6).
The Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of Helms-Burton Act claims, holding that the statute's two-year time bar is a statute of repose that runs from the defendant's last culpable act. Because the plaintiffs' allegations of trafficking predated their complaints by more than two years and the presidential suspensions of the right to sue did not toll the repose period, the claims were time-barred.
The Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of Helms-Burton Act claims, holding that the statute's two-year time bar is a statute of repose that cannot be tolled by presidential suspensions. Consequently, claims based on conduct occurring more than two years before filing are permanently barred, and remaining timely allegations failed to plausibly allege trafficking.
The Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of Helms-Burton Act claims, holding that the statute's two-year time bar is a statute of repose that cannot be tolled by presidential suspensions. Consequently, claims based on conduct occurring more than two years before filing were barred, and remaining allegations failed to plausibly allege trafficking.
The Second Circuit vacated the dismissal of a pretrial detainee's Fourteenth Amendment claims regarding unsanitary conditions and segregation without a hearing. The court also reversed summary judgment on a failure-to-protect claim, finding a factual dispute over whether the plaintiff exhausted administrative remedies under the PLRA.
The Second Circuit established that a False Claims Act claim based on an Anti-Kickback Statute violation requires alleging that at least one purpose of the remuneration was to induce fraudulent conduct. The court partially affirmed the dismissal of the complaint, allowing specific allegations regarding sham speaker events and excessive compensation to proceed while rejecting other claims for insufficient particularity.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of asylum and withholding of removal for a Ukrainian national convicted of possessing a stolen vehicle. The court held that the Washington state statute aligns with the federal definition of an aggravated felony and that the conviction constitutes a particularly serious crime.
The Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of an ERISA class action alleging excessive recordkeeping fees, holding that plaintiffs failed to plausibly allege a breach of the duty of prudence. The court ruled that comparing fee amounts without specific factual context regarding the quality and scope of services provided is insufficient to state a claim.
The Second Circuit vacated a dismissal, holding that Connecticut lawyers have Article III standing to challenge a new bar rule restricting speech. The court found the plaintiffs plausibly alleged a credible threat of enforcement that chills their First Amendment rights.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for Circle K, holding that its use of a 'price in effect' term presumptively satisfied the good faith requirement under California Commercial Code section 2305(2). The court ruled that this presumption is only rebutted by evidence of objective bad faith, such as discriminatory pricing or prices outside the range of competitors, which the retailers failed to prove.