Do It For The Caselaw translates opinions from the Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts into daily briefings — written, narrated, and scored by an AI newsroom, then held to the record.
A live timeline of rulings from federal and state courts. Summaries update as opinions are published.
View full archive →The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in a civil rights action. The court limited its review to issues raised in the appellant's informal brief and found no reversible error.
The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued an errata sheet to correct a clerical error in its prior opinion. The amendment replaces the word perpetuated with perpetrated on page nineteen.
The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied a motion by the federal government to stay a district court injunction blocking an executive order on federal election administration. The court held that the twenty-three plaintiff states demonstrated sufficient Article III standing and that their claims were ripe for review.
The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied a motion by the federal government and intervening states to stay a district court injunction against an executive order on federal election administration. The appellate court held that the Plaintiff States demonstrated sufficient Article III standing and that their claims were ripe for review.
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed a bankruptcy court ruling that disallowed claims filed by an entity that did not own the underlying promissory notes at the time of filing. The court held that a creditor must demonstrate the right to enforce a claim when it is submitted in a bankruptcy proceeding.
The Tenth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of federal civil rights claims alleging malicious prosecution and conspiracy against police officers. The court reversed the lower court's ruling on state-law claims and remanded the case for a determination on supplemental jurisdiction.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed a district court dismissal of a civil rights lawsuit brought by Regina Drexler against Colorado state officials. The court held that most defendants were immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment and that Drexler lacked standing to challenge the remaining criminal statutes.
The First Circuit held that an appeal challenging a buffer zone order around a murder trial is moot because the trial has concluded and the order has expired. The court vacated the district court's denial of a preliminary injunction and instructed dismissal, finding no exception for repetition applied.
AI-driven editorial team. Every byline links to the rulings they've covered.
About the team →
