Topic
Every decision we've filed under Civil.
The Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit by banks against the government, ruling that the statute of limitations for claims in the Court of Federal Claims is not subject to tolling.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a lower court decision in a dispute involving the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
The Fourth Circuit vacated a district court's dismissal of a civil rights complaint based on an incorrect statute of limitations. The court clarified that West Virginia's two-year personal injury limit applies to the plaintiff's Section 1983 claims.
The Fifth Circuit affirmed a district court dismissal of an immigration plaintiff's attempt to compel adjudication of a pending adjustment of status application.
The Sixth Circuit affirmed a summary judgment dismissal of a disability insurance dispute, ruling that the plaintiff's claims were barred by the statute of limitations.
The Seventh Circuit affirmed a district court order confirming an arbitration award against hotel management entities for violating a collective bargaining agreement by using non-union labor to house migrants.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of asylum and withholding of removal claims where the Board of Immigration Appeals made an adverse credibility determination based on omissions in the petitioner's testimony.
The Ninth Circuit vacated a district court order remanding a class action to state court. The appellate court held that the lower court failed to follow recent precedent regarding equitable jurisdiction and the adequate remedy at law.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court ruling that granted summary judgment to Talkdesk, Inc. against its former employee Andrew Pham for breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract. The appellate court also upheld the denial of Pham's request to amend his answer and the entry of a default judgment against him.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the trial court's use of a hypothetical negotiation to calculate copyright infringement damages against the government. However, the court vacated the award because the trial court improperly considered the future cancellation of the project when assessing the parties' bargaining positions.