4th Cir.

Richard Lee Gravely v. Brady Hinchman

July 17, 2026 ·25-6627 ·Per Curiam · By Aisha Johnson

The Fourth Circuit vacated a district court's dismissal of a civil rights complaint based on an incorrect statute of limitations. The court clarified that West Virginia's two-year personal injury limit applies to the plaintiff's Section 1983 claims.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / 1:04

Background

Richard Lee Gravely filed a Section 1983 complaint alleging false arrest and malicious prosecution against Deputy Brady Hinchman. The district court dismissed the claims as untimely under a one-year state statute of limitations.

The court’s reasoning

The court held that where state law provides multiple statutes of limitations for personal injury actions, courts considering Section 1983 claims should borrow the general or residual statute. In West Virginia, a two-year statute applies. The complaint filed in October 2024 was timely under the two-year limit.

where state law provides multiple statutes of limitations for personal injury actions, courts considering § 1983 claims should borrow the general or residual statute for personal injury actions.

Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235, 249-50 (1989)

What it means going forward

The case returns to the district court for further proceedings on the merits, as the statute of limitations defense was incorrectly applied.