Background
Zhiwei Chen, proceeding pro se, appealed from a district court judgment on the pleadings dismissing his diversity action alleging state law claims arising from an automobile accident. The district court had denied Chen’s motion to remand the action to state court and granted judgment on the pleadings in favor of the defendant.
The court’s reasoning
The panel reviewed the case de novo. The court held that the district court properly denied the motion to remand because it had subject matter jurisdiction under the diversity statute. The court further held that the district court properly granted judgment on the pleadings because the relevant insurance policy granted the defendant the authority to settle any claim or suit. The court cited California law stating that where a policy provides discretion to settle claims, the insurance company generally has no liability to the insured for settling within the policy limits. The court rejected Chen’s contention that the district court abused its power as unsupported by the record.
What it means going forward
The decision reinforces that insurance companies with settlement discretion in their policies are generally not liable for settling claims within policy limits, even if the insured disagrees with the settlement.
Podcast (federal-narrative-summaries): Play in new window | Download