9th Cir.

Eiland v. CoreCivic, Inc., et al.

July 20, 2026 ·2:22-cv-01664-MTL ·Unpublished · By James Taylor

A Ninth Circuit panel affirmed summary judgment for prison officials against an inmate alleging due process violations following disciplinary action over child pornography images.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / 1:06

Background

Randy Carl Eiland, an inmate at Saguaro Correctional Center, challenged disciplinary proceedings regarding an MP three player containing images of child pornography. He was placed in segregation for fifteen days without loss of good time credits. He sued under Section nineteen eighty-three of Title forty-two of the United States Code.

The court’s reasoning

The court applied the Sandin standard, which requires a sanction to extend the sentence or impose an atypical and significant hardship. The panel found fifteen days in segregation did not meet this threshold. The sanction did not affect sentence length, and administrative segregation alone typically does not implicate a protected liberty interest.

What it means going forward

Prison officials retain discretion to impose short-term segregation for disciplinary infractions without triggering full due process hearings.