4th Cir.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Every decision we've summarized from United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

May 4 2026
25-1514 Per Curiam

ESTATE OF KATHERINE MONICA VICKERS, Rupa Vickers Russe as the Executor of the Estate and RUPA VICKERS RUSSE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court judgment dismissing a Federal Tort Claims Act lawsuit against the Department of Veterans Affairs. The appellate court held that the plaintiff's claims were time-barred and that her gender discrimination claim was unexhausted.

May 1 2026
26-6126 Per Curiam

Watts v. Burkey

The Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal challenging a magistrate judge's denial of a motion to amend a civil rights complaint because the order was not final or immediately appealable. The court clarified that the subsequent grant of summary judgment does not cure the jurisdictional defect for the earlier amendment denial.

May 1 2026
25-6639 Per Curiam

RODNEY ELROY COBBS v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; TABOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; KAELYN N. SWEET, The Sweet Law Firm; SHERIFF EDWARD MCMAHON

The Fourth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a prisoner's civil rights complaint because the appellant failed to challenge the specific legal basis for the dismissal in his informal brief. The court held that this failure resulted in a forfeiture of appellate review regarding the merits of the underlying claim.

May 1 2026
26-6116 Per Curiam

Deanna Sharp v. South Carolina Department of Social Services

The Fourth Circuit dismissed Deanna Sharp's appeal from a district court order denying her habeas petition because she filed her notice of appeal past the mandatory thirty-day deadline. The court held that strict adherence to the filing period is a jurisdictional requirement, leaving the appellate court without authority to hear the case.

May 1 2026
25-6625 Per Curiam

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. XAVIER MILTON EARQUHART

The Fourth Circuit dismissed Xavier Milton Earquhart's federal habeas appeal because he failed to make the requisite substantial showing that reasonable jurists could debate the district court's denial of constitutional relief. The court independently reviewed the record and found no debatable constitutional claims or procedural errors warranting further review.