Jul 7 2026
10th Cir. 25-3131 Panel Decision

Hoffman, et al. v. United States Department of Treasury, et al.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit challenging Treasury regulations under the Inflation Reduction Act. The court held that the plaintiffs lacked Article III standing because they failed to demonstrate a concrete injury in fact resulting from the agency's failure to require National Environmental Policy Act compliance.

Jul 2 2026
5th Cir. 25-50919 Per Curiam

Joseph Anthony Reyna v. Spotify Technology, S.A.

The Fifth Circuit granted the appellant's request to proceed in forma pauperis while affirming the district court's dismissal of his civil action. The court found the appeal nonfrivolous regarding subject matter jurisdiction but upheld the lower court's ruling that the complaint failed to state a claim.

Jun 26 2026
11th Cir. 6:24-cv-00212-ACC-NWH Per Curiam

Non-Argument Calendar ATLC, INC. A Florida corporation Plaintiff-Counter v. BROADBAND ITV, INC A foreign corporation Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellant GERALD J. DAIGLE, JR. et al

The Eleventh Circuit dismissed an appeal filed by Broadband iTV, Inc. because the district court orders it challenged were not final judgments. The court held that it lacked jurisdiction since the underlying litigation remained pending on other counts.

Jun 24 2026
4th Cir. 26-1171 Per Curiam

Horton v. Fussell

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal filed by Timothy Fussell regarding a partial default judgment. The court held that the district court orders sought to be appealed were neither final nor appealable interlocutory orders.

Jun 24 2026
4th Cir. 26-1200 Per Curiam

Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 v. Cherniavska

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal filed by a self-represented litigant before the district court entered a final order. The court held that it lacked jurisdiction because the appeal was premature and did not meet statutory requirements for interlocutory review.