Topic
Every decision we've filed under Other Civil.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed a petition for review filed by Fumizer, LLC against the Food and Drug Administration. The court ruled the petition was untimely because it was filed one day after the statutory thirty-day deadline.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal filed by a pro se plaintiff because the notice of appeal was not filed within the required timeframe. The court held that the timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement that was not met in this instance.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal filed by Joe L. Adams, Jr. against the United States Post Office. The court held that the district court order Adams sought to challenge was neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dismissed an appeal in a civil dispute between POM Group Inc. and several Schedule A defendants. The dismissal was granted by order of the parties under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure forty-two, subsection B.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal filed by pro se plaintiffs challenging various district court orders. The court held that the appealed orders were not final or appealable interlocutory orders under federal law.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court order denying a pro se plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint. The appellate court found no reversible error in the lower court's refusal to consider untimely objections to a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.
The Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of a pro se complaint against the Army. The court found no reversible error in the lower court's handling of the case despite the appellant's objections.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed this appeal sua sponte because the notice of appeal was filed well past the statutory deadline. The court found it lacked jurisdiction to hear the case due to the untimely filing.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dismissed an appeal regarding a ministerial order from the Court of Federal Claims. The court held that such administrative housekeeping decisions do not constitute final decisions subject to appellate review.
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the denial of Jada Orr's motion to file a third amended complaint. The court held amendment would have been futile because the proposed pleading largely repeated her prior allegations, while her state-law contract claim was properly dismissed without prejudice after the federal claims were dismissed.