4th Cir.

Marcus D. Allison v. Warden Alfredo Martell

June 24, 2026 ·26-6194 ·Per Curiam · By James Taylor

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal filed by Marcus D. Allison because the underlying district court order he challenged was vacated. The court found the appeal moot since the district court had already granted Allison's motion for reconsideration to allow him to file objections.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / 0:58

Background

Marcus D. Allison filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. The district court initially accepted a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, granting summary judgment to the respondent and denying relief in December 2025. Allison filed a notice of appeal, but before that appeal was processed, the district court granted his motion for reconsideration and vacated the December 2025 order to permit him to file objections to the magistrate judge’s report.

The court’s reasoning

The court concluded that Allison’s appeal was moot because the district court vacated the specific order he was challenging. The court cited Williams versus Ozmint, explaining that a case becomes moot when the issues presented are no longer live or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome. Since the district court vacated the order, the court was deprived of jurisdiction over the appeal.

What it means going forward

The dismissal prevents the appellate court from reviewing the merits of the habeas petition, leaving the case pending in the district court for further proceedings regarding the magistrate judge’s report.