Jun 23 2026
9th Cir. 1:24-cr-00135-SPW-1 Unpublished

USA v. Russell

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of a motion to dismiss an indictment for receiving a firearm while under felony indictment. The court held that federal law does not require an individualized assessment of dangerousness to disarm individuals facing felony charges.

Jun 23 2026
9th Cir. 9:24-cr-00049-DLC-1 Unpublished

USA v. Brown

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea by a felon in possession of a firearm. The court also upheld the classification of the defendant's prior bank robbery conviction as a crime of violence for sentencing purposes.

Jun 23 2026
4th Cir. 25-4406 Per Curiam

United States v. Cozart

The Fourth Circuit affirmed in part and dismissed in part the appeal of a defendant convicted of conspiracy to distribute fentanyl and methamphetamine. The court held that the defendant's guilty plea was valid and that his appeal waiver barred challenges to the reasonableness of his sentence.

Jun 23 2026
6th Cir. 25-5634 Published

United States v. Brown

The Sixth Circuit affirmed a twenty-four-month prison sentence for a defendant convicted of conspiring to distribute methamphetamine. The court rejected challenges regarding drug quantity calculations, the district court's explanation for denying a sentencing variance, and the substantive reasonableness of the sentence.

Jun 23 2026
10th Cir. 1:23-CV-01773-PAB-NRN Panel Decision

Jefferson v. Stancil, et al.

The Tenth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a prisoner's constitutional challenge to Colorado's Sex Offender Treatment and Monitoring Program. The court held that the program's requirements were reasonably related to legitimate penological interests and that the plaintiff lacked standing for certain claims.

Jun 22 2026
11th Cir. 3:23-cr-00078-MCR-2 Per Curiam

United States v. Zuniga

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed a federal drug trafficking sentence after finding no procedural error in the district court's application of a role enhancement. The court held that evidence supported the finding that the defendant supervised a co-conspirator, satisfying the requirements for a three-level increase under the sentencing guidelines.