Jun 22 2026
11th Cir. 3:23-cr-00078-MCR-2 Per Curiam

United States v. Zuniga

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed a federal drug trafficking sentence after finding no procedural error in the district court's application of a role enhancement. The court held that evidence supported the finding that the defendant supervised a co-conspirator, satisfying the requirements for a three-level increase under the sentencing guidelines.

Jun 22 2026
11th Cir. 3:24-cr-00073-TKW-1 Per Curiam

United States v. Watson

The Eleventh Circuit granted appointed counsel's motion to withdraw from representing Kenney Lee Watson on appeal. The court affirmed Watson's conviction and sentence after an independent review found no arguable issues of merit.

Jun 22 2026
11th Cir. 3:24-cr-00203-MMH-LLL-1 Per Curiam

United States v. Gibbs

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the conviction and sentence of a defendant convicted of possessing a firearm as a convicted felon. The court rejected the defendant's Second Amendment challenge and found no abuse of discretion in the sentencing decision.

Jun 22 2026
7th Cir. 24-2260 Panel Decision

United States v. Jackson

The Seventh Circuit affirmed the conviction of a defendant charged with sex trafficking and conspiracy. The court held that the search warrant was supported by probable cause and that the district court properly admitted expert testimony on trafficking dynamics.

Jun 18 2026
Fed. Cir. 24-1990 Panel Decision

Jacobson v. United States

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a whistleblower's complaint challenging the Attorney General's determination that her declaration was invalid. The court held that the Financial Institutions Anti-Fraud Enforcement Act of nineteen ninety explicitly bars judicial review of the Attorney General's actions regarding whistleblower declarations.

Jun 18 2026
11th Cir. 9:22-cr-80173-AMC-2 Published

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WILLIAM MICHAEL SPEARMAN

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed a life sentence for a defendant who led a dark web child pornography network. The court held that the district court properly denied a suppression hearing because the defendant failed to allege sufficient facts to prove a joint venture between the FBI and a foreign law enforcement agency.