Jun 5 2024
3rd Cir. 2-20-cv-2576 Panel Decision

Elmagin Capital, LLC v. Chen

The Third Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of post-trial motions in a trade secret dispute, upholding a jury verdict that found the strategies were trade secrets but not misappropriated. The court also rejected a request for a jury trial on the issue of attorney's fees, ruling that such determinations are matters of law for the judge.

Jun 5 2024
3rd Cir. 2-20-cv-2576 Panel Decision

Elmagin Capital, LLC v. Chen

The Third Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Elmagin's motions for judgment as a matter of law and a new trial in a trade secret dispute. The appellate court held that the jury's verdict, which found the strategies were trade secrets but not misappropriated, was supported by sufficient evidence.

Jun 5 2024
3rd Cir. 2-20-cv-2576 Panel Decision

Elmagin Capital, LLC v. Chen

The Third Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Elmagin's motions for judgment as a matter of law and a new trial regarding trade secret misappropriation claims. The court held that the jury's verdict, which found trade secrets existed but were not misappropriated, was supported by sufficient evidence.

Jun 5 2024
3rd Cir. 2-20-cv-2576 Panel Decision

Elmagin Capital, LLC v. Chen

The Third Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Elmagin's post-trial motions, upholding a jury verdict that found trade secrets existed but were not misappropriated. The court also confirmed that attorneys' fees claims in trade secret cases are matters for the judge, not a jury.

Jun 4 2024
United States Court… 23-1239 Panel Decision

TRENTON PALMER v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, ADMINISTRATOR AND NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD

The D.C. Circuit denied a petition for review of an NTSB order affirming a pilot's violation of federal aviation regulations for flying below minimum safe altitudes. The court rejected the pilot's arguments regarding alleged ALJ errors, insufficient notice in the complaint, and a request to overrule prior precedent on sanction deference.

Jun 3 2024
9th Cir. 22-954 Published

MARLON ALONZO SMITH v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General

The Ninth Circuit denied Marlon Alonzo Smith's petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' order denying Convention Against Torture relief and finding him removable. The court held that Smith failed to preserve his challenges to the authenticity of key government documents and found substantial evidence supported the denial of CAT protection.

May 15 2024
9th Cir. 21-0319 Published

TOTAL TERMINALS INTERNATIONAL, LLC; SIGNAL MUTUAL INDEMNITY ASSOCIATION, LTD v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKER’S COMPENSATION PROGRAMS; ROBERT TOWER

The Ninth Circuit held that a longshoreman with unilateral hearing loss and bilateral tinnitus is entitled to compensation under the statutory rate for one ear, not the higher rate for bilateral hearing loss. The court also ruled that the Benefits Review Board's remand order was final and appealable because only a ministerial act remained for the Administrative Law Judge to complete.

May 10 2024
United States Court… 22-5150 Panel Decision

Maria Esparraguera v. Department of the Army, et al.

The D.C. Circuit reversed the district court's dismissal of a federal employee's due process claim, holding that career appointees in the Senior Executive Service possess a protected property interest in their tenure after completing their probationary period. The court reasoned that because the Civil Service Reform Act limits removals to specific causes for tenured SES employees, they are entitled to constitutional procedural protections before being removed.

Apr 30 2024
United States Court… 22-1101 Panel Decision

Alabama Municipal Distributors Group v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

The D.C. Circuit denied petitions challenging the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's certification of the Evangeline Pass Expansion Project, ruling that the agency reasonably applied the National Environmental Policy Act. The court also upheld FERC's decision to deny windfall profit credits to existing pipeline customers who would not use the new capacity.