Background
The appellant, Jordan Powell, removed a landlord-tenant case from the District of Columbia Superior Court to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The district court subsequently remanded the case back to the D.C. Superior Court. The appellant filed an appeal to the D.C. Circuit challenging this remand order.
The court’s reasoning
The court determined it lacked appellate jurisdiction over the district court’s order remanding the case. While Section twenty-eight U.S.C. Section one thousand four hundred forty-seven subsection D permits review of remand orders in cases removed under Section one thousand four hundred forty-two or Section one thousand four hundred forty-three, the appellant did not remove the case pursuant to those specific statutes. Consequently, the court could not exercise jurisdiction over the remand.
What it means going forward
The dismissal reinforces the general rule that remand orders are not subject to appellate review unless the removal was based on specific federal statutes. Parties must ensure their removal notices explicitly cite the correct statutory authority if they intend to preserve the right to appeal a remand.
Podcast (federal-narrative-summaries): Play in new window | Download