Topic
Every decision we've filed under Civil.
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of a Rule sixty motion filed by a pro se plaintiff. The court held the appeal was patently frivolous and bound by the law of the case doctrine.
The Third Circuit affirmed a district court order confirming an arbitration award resolving a law firm dissolution dispute. The court rejected the appellant's claims that the arbitrators manifestly disregarded the law or committed misconduct regarding fee distributions and jurisdictional limits.
The Third Circuit affirmed a district court's grant of summary judgment against Lakeview Pharmacy, ruling that the exclusion of its untimely expert report was not an abuse of discretion. The court held that because Lakeview failed to seek proper extensions and disregarded discovery deadlines, the late submission was procedurally barred.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has issued an opinion in this case. Judgment has been entered in accordance with the court's decision.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court judgment finding patent claims invalid. The court held that the asserted claims were indefinite under Section thirty-five of the United States Code, Section one hundred twelve.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dismissed a petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board. The dismissal occurred because the petitioner failed to pay the required docketing fee within the time permitted by court rules.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision in a nonprecedential order. The court reviewed challenges to patent validity arising from inter partes review proceedings without issuing a written opinion.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision in an inter partes review proceeding. The court issued a per curiam judgment without providing a written opinion.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Merit Systems Protection Board's decision in a federal employment dispute involving the United States Postal Service. The court issued a per curiam order without providing a written explanation for its ruling.
The Federal Circuit affirmed the Merit Systems Protection Board's dismissal of John Suggs's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The court held that disputes over severance pay and debt garnishment do not constitute appealable adverse actions under the relevant federal statute.