Jul 8 2026
5th Cir. 25-40301 Per Curiam

Salinas v. Ramirez

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Roberto Salinas's civil rights complaint against Sheriff Romeo Ramirez. The appellate court found that Salinas failed to identify errors in the lower court's analysis regarding his constitutional claims and lacked jurisdiction over certain procedural orders.

Jul 8 2026
10th Cir. 4:25-CV-00679-SEH-CDL Panel Decision

Shapiro v. Campanelli

The Tenth Circuit remanded a civil rights case where the district court dismissed a pro se complaint without explaining why amendment would be futile. The appellate panel held that while the complaint failed to state a claim, the lower court erred by not allowing the plaintiff an opportunity to amend.

Jul 8 2026
5th Cir. 25-40173 Per Curiam

Salinas v. Ramirez

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Roberto Salinas's civil rights complaint against a county sheriff. The appellate court found that Salinas failed to identify errors in the lower court's analysis regarding constitutional claims and lacked jurisdiction over certain procedural orders.

Jul 8 2026
Fed. Cir. 24-2349 Panel Decision

Corcoran v. Office of Personnel Management

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the denial of survivor annuity benefits to a petitioner who claimed a common law marriage. The court held that the petitioner failed to provide substantial evidence of an express mutual agreement to be presently married prior to her husband's death.

Jul 8 2026
11th Cir. 1:25-cv-21172-EIS Per Curiam

David W. Langley v. Liza Hazan

The Eleventh Circuit dismissed an appeal challenging a district court's remand order and denial of reconsideration. The court concluded it lacked jurisdiction because the remand was based on a lack of subject matter jurisdiction and the attorney fees amount remained undetermined.

Jul 8 2026
11th Cir. 5:24-cv-00167-MCR-MJF Per Curiam

Tlusty v. Alexander

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a former federal prisoner's complaint against prison officials for failure to state a claim. The court held that the prisoner's medical and search-and-seizure claims presented a new context for a Bivens action where special factors counseled against extending the remedy.