Topic
Every decision we've filed under Civil.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit dismissed this appeal for lack of prosecution. The court denied all pending motions as moot and issued a mandate to the lower court.
The First Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a First Amendment challenge to Maine's IOLTA program, ruling that the plaintiffs failed to plausibly allege that the program compelled their speech. The court held that the plaintiffs did not sufficiently demonstrate that the client funds in question would have earned net interest outside the IOLTA program, a necessary element for a compelled-speech claim under existing precedent.
The Sixth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for city officials, ruling that a former council member failed to prove his prosecution was retaliatory because he lacked probable cause to rebut the presumption of validity arising from a grand jury indictment. The court held that the official's undisclosed financial interest in a public contract negated any First Amendment protection, regardless of the government's motive.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dismissed a petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board. The dismissal occurred because the petitioner failed to pay the required docketing fee within the time permitted by court rules.
The D.C. Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a challenge to the State Department's handling of Diversity Immigrant Visa applications for fiscal year 2021. The court held that federal courts lack the authority to order the agency to adjudicate visas after the statutory fiscal year has expired, rendering such claims moot and lacking standing.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of a default judgment on trademark infringement claims, finding no clear error in the lower court's analysis of likelihood of confusion. The appellate panel upheld the dismissal of the plaintiff's claims, ruling that the marks were not sufficiently similar and the businesses were geographically isolated.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dismissed an appeal in a patent dispute between Cognipower and Samsung. The dismissal was granted by mutual agreement of the parties under the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
The Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal as untimely because the appellants failed to file their notice of appeal within the mandatory thirty-day period. The court also affirmed the denial of a one-day extension, rejecting the argument that mailing the notice via FedEx satisfied federal filing requirements.
The Fourth Circuit vacated a preliminary injunction that had allowed student-athletes to play despite the NCAA's JUCO Rule, holding that the district court applied the wrong legal standard. The appellate court ruled that eligibility rules must be analyzed under the full 'rule of reason' framework rather than a simplified quick-look approach, requiring a complete factual record before determining if the rules unreasonably restrain trade.
The Fifth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for American First National Bank, ruling that the Browns failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove racial discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. The court held that the plaintiffs' allegations were speculative and did not allow a reasonable jury to infer that the bank's refusal to open accounts was motivated by race rather than legitimate business concerns.