9th Cir.

Fredrick v. Blanche

May 13, 2026 ·25-4037 ·Unpublished · By James Taylor

The Ninth Circuit denied an asylum claim but granted relief regarding protection under the Convention Against Torture. The court remanded the case to order deferral of removal for a Nigerian national who faced torture due to his sexual orientation.

Background

Petitioner Julius Omene Fredrick, a native and citizen of Nigeria, entered the United States in 2016 and overstayed his visa. In 2023, he was convicted of conspiracy to launder money and sentenced to forty-six months in prison. He petitioned for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals decision affirming the denial of his asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture.

The court’s reasoning

The court found the agency’s analysis of the particularly serious crime determination sufficient because it referred to the elements of the offense before assessing other factors. However, the court agreed that the agency erred in denying Convention Against Torture relief. The record showed the petitioner was credible and suffered mistreatment including drugging, beating, and rape on account of his sexual orientation. Such brutality qualifies as torture, and government acquiescence is apparent given that Nigeria criminalizes homosexual conduct.

What it means going forward

The petitioner’s removal is deferred pending further proceedings, though his asylum and withholding claims remain denied due to the particularly serious crime conviction.