4th Cir.

In re Magus Jamye Reficul Ahnend

July 21, 2026 ·26-1734 ·Per Curiam ·Per Curiam · By Maria Santos

The Fourth Circuit denied a petition for writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / 0:37

Background

Magus Jamye Reficul Ahnend filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. He alleged that the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia unduly delayed ruling on his objections to a magistrate judge’s proposed findings and recommendation in his civil case.

The court’s reasoning

The court reviewed the present record and determined it did not reveal undue delay in the district court’s handling of the matter.

The present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court.

What it means going forward

The district court is not compelled to act immediately, and the petitioner’s objections remain subject to the district court’s timeline.