4th Cir.

Karl Linard Malloy v. William Anthony Brosious et al.

June 30, 2026 ·26-1474 ·Per Curiam · By Maria Santos

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal filed by a debtor challenging a bankruptcy court order. The court held that the order approving the hiring of counsel was not a final order, leaving the appellate court without jurisdiction.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / 1:04

Background

Karl Linard Malloy, proceeding pro se, sought to appeal a district court order that had dismissed his bankruptcy appeal. The underlying dispute involved a bankruptcy court order approving the hiring of counsel.

The court’s reasoning

The court explained that district courts have jurisdiction to hear appeals from bankruptcy judges’ final judgments, orders, and decrees under Section one thousand five hundred eighty of Title twenty-eight of the United States Code. However, orders in bankruptcy cases qualify as final only when they definitively dispose of discrete disputes within the overarching bankruptcy case. The court found that an order approving the hiring of counsel does not meet this standard. Because the bankruptcy court’s order was not final, the appellate court lacked jurisdiction under Section one thousand five hundred eighty of Title twenty-eight.

What it means going forward

This decision reinforces that parties cannot appeal intermediate bankruptcy orders, such as those regarding counsel hiring, until a final disposition of the discrete dispute is reached.