4th Cir.

State of South Carolina v. Japheth Ashley Hutchinson

June 23, 2026 ·26-1359 ·Per Curiam · By Maria Santos

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal challenging a district court order remanding a case to state court. The court held that such remand orders are generally not reviewable under federal statute.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / 1:26

Background

Japheth Ashley Hutchinson appealed a district court order that accepted a magistrate judge’s recommendation and remanded the case to state court based on a lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

The court’s reasoning

The court relied on 28 U.S.C. Section one thousand four hundred forty-seven-d, which states that with limited exceptions not applicable here, a district court’s order remanding a removed case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise. The court cited Doe versus Blair, noting that a district court may remand a case sua sponte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction at any time, and such an order is not reviewable.

A district court may remand a case sua sponte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction at any time, and such an order is not reviewable.

Doe v. Blair, 819 F.3d 64, 66-67 (4th Cir. 2016)

What it means going forward

This decision reinforces the finality of remand orders in removal cases, preventing appellate review unless specific statutory exceptions apply.