4th Cir.

Eric Maurice Pinckney v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service

March 17, 2026 ·25-1894 ·Per Curiam · By Maria Santos

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a Tax Court order dismissing a taxpayer's challenge to restitution-based assessments for lack of jurisdiction. The appellate court also upheld summary judgment regarding unpaid federal income tax and civil penalties.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / --:--

Background

Eric Maurice Pinckney appealed a Tax Court order that dismissed his challenge to collection of restitution-based assessments for tax years two thousand and eight, two thousand and nine, two thousand and ten, two thousand and eleven, and two thousand and sixteen for lack of jurisdiction. The Tax Court also granted summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner regarding Pinckney’s remaining liabilities, including unpaid federal income tax for tax years two thousand and eleven and two thousand and sixteen, and civil penalties for years two thousand and nine and two thousand and ten.

The court’s reasoning

The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The opinion states that the appellate court affirms for the reasons stated by the Tax Court in its July ninth, two thousand and twenty-five decision.

What it means going forward

The decision confirms the enforceability of restitution-based assessments and upholds summary judgment on unpaid taxes and penalties, leaving the taxpayer liable for the assessed amounts.

Play