Background
American Acceptance Corporation of South Carolina held security interests in two motorcycles seized by the Lexington County Sheriff’s Department during a murder investigation. The department retained the vehicles as material evidence without notifying the corporation, which had learned of the seizure through news reports. The corporation sued under Section nineteen eighty-three of the United States Code, alleging a violation of procedural due process rights for the lack of notice and an opportunity to be heard. The district court granted the sheriff’s department’s motion to dismiss, concluding that the initial seizure was lawful and the corporation’s property interest must yield to the government’s need to preserve evidence.
The court’s reasoning
The court determined that the Fourth Amendment, rather than the Fourteenth Amendment, defines the process due for seizures of property in criminal cases. Citing precedent, the court found that compliance with the Fourth Amendment satisfies pre-deprivation procedural due process when property is seized for investigatory purposes. Because the motorcycles were lawfully seized and retained as evidence in an active murder investigation, no further process was required. The court rejected arguments based on City of West Covina v. Perkins and Krimstock v. Kelly, noting that those cases concerned different circumstances where the government’s right to retain property had ended or where the property was essential for livelihood in a different context. The court also found no error in the district court’s consideration of documents incorporated into the complaint.
When seizing property for criminal investigatory purposes, compliance with the Fourth Amendment satisfies pre-deprivation procedural due process.
Rodgers v. Knight, 781 F.3d 932, 941 (8th Cir. 2015)
What it means going forward
The ruling clarifies that third-party lienholders do not have an automatic right to notice or a hearing regarding seized evidence while a criminal investigation is ongoing. It reinforces the ability of law enforcement to retain physical evidence without interference from civil claims during the pendency of charges.
Podcast (federal-narrative-summaries): Play in new window | Download