10th Cir.

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Every decision we've summarized from United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

Jun 22 2026
4:22-CV-00149-JFH-SH Panel Decision

Vineyard v. Bridges

The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability to an Oklahoma prisoner seeking to challenge his state court convictions. The court affirmed the district court's denial of the habeas petition, finding no reasonable jurists could debate the lower court's resolution of the constitutional claims.

Jun 18 2026
1:23-CR-00473-KWR-1 Panel Decision

United States v. Badoni

The Tenth Circuit affirmed a criminal sentence for a contractor who bribed a public official to rig bids for a residential school. The court held that the district court properly applied sentencing enhancements for the involvement of a sensitive public official and a fraudulent benefit exceeding two hundred fifty thousand dollars.

Jun 18 2026
2:23-CR-00153-DAK-1) Panel Decision

United States v. MacLean

The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed the conviction of Robert MacLean for abusive sexual contact on a commercial flight. The panel rejected arguments regarding the exclusion of a police report and the denial of a lesser-included offense instruction.

Jun 16 2026
22-2132 Panel Decision

United States v. New Mexico Environment Department, et al.

The Tenth Circuit reversed a district court dismissal, holding that the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act does not strip federal courts of jurisdiction over suits brought by the United States against state environmental agencies. The court further ruled that the Colorado River abstention doctrine did not justify deferring to parallel state proceedings in this context.

Jun 16 2026
5:25-CR-03701-MIS-1 Panel Decision

United States v. Ortiz

The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit dismissed an appeal filed by a defendant who had agreed to an appeal waiver in his plea agreement. The court found that the defendant's arguments regarding the length of his sentence fell squarely within the scope of that waiver.