Raj Patel

Correspondent

Raj Patel

Breaking news correspondent, covers late-night developments and emergency rulings.

Immigration & Government

Decisions covered by Raj Patel

874 decisions
Apr 20 2026
9th Cir. 2:24-cv-00528-JR Unpublished

Martin v. Bisignano

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of Social Security disability benefits, ruling that the Administrative Law Judge's decision was supported by substantial evidence. The court held that the ALJ provided clear and convincing reasons to discount the claimant's subjective testimony regarding her symptoms.

Apr 20 2026
9th Cir. 19-72227 Unpublished

MARIA FLORES V. TODD BLANCHE

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of withholding of removal and Convention Against Tortate relief for a Mexican national fearing cartel violence. The court held that the petitioner failed to prove a causal nexus between the feared harm and a statutorily protected ground.

Apr 20 2026
9th Cir. 25-2578 Unpublished

DE LA ROSA MARTINEZ V. BLANCHE

The Ninth Circuit denied a petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals decision rejecting an asylum claim, finding that the immigration judge's reliance on evidence was supported by substantial evidence. The court held that any procedural error regarding interview notes was harmless because the judge did not credit them as true, and that the petitioner failed to meet the high burden required to overturn the agency's factual findings.

Apr 20 2026
9th Cir. 25-1953 Unpublished

Bazurto-Romo v. Blanche

The Ninth Circuit held that a petitioner's claim of derivative citizenship presents a genuine issue of material fact that cannot be resolved by the Board of Immigration Appeals. Consequently, the court transferred the case to the United States District Court for a de novo determination of the nationality claim.

Apr 17 2026
6th Cir. 25-3517 Published

STAR SERVICES CORPORATION v. OWCP, et al

The Sixth Circuit affirmed an award of Black Lung Benefits Act benefits, holding that the employer failed to rebut the statutory presumption that a miner's death was caused by pneumoconiosis. The court found the administrative law judge's reliance on medical evidence establishing total disability and legal pneumoconiosis sufficient to meet the claimant's burden.

Apr 17 2026
4th Cir. 25-1385 Panel Decision

Kelly Milligan v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated; Bank of America Corporation

The Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court ruling that a financial firm's long-term contingent incentive awards do not qualify as an employee pension benefit plan under ERISA. The court held that the WealthChoice Award program constitutes an exempt bonus plan because it is designed to incentivize retention and productivity rather than systematically defer income for retirement.

Apr 17 2026
9th Cir. 24-6168 Unpublished

SAUL GABRIEL SALES-LOPEZ v. TODD BLANCHE, Acting Attorney General

The Ninth Circuit denied a petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals decision, ruling that the petitioner's motions to reopen and reconsider were barred by statutory time limits and the one-motion rule. The court found no exceptions applied because the petitioner failed to demonstrate changed country conditions or fundamental unfairness in his immigration proceedings.

Apr 17 2026
9th Cir. 25-3072 Unpublished

BIATO RODEL OVALLE-BAMACA v. TODD BLANCHE, Acting Attorney General

The Ninth Circuit denied a petition for review, upholding the Board of Immigration Appeals' rejection of an immigrant's claims for cancellation of removal, asylum, and protection from torture. The court found substantial evidence supported the agency's conclusion that the petitioner failed to prove exceptional hardship to his children and did not demonstrate changed circumstances to excuse his late asylum filing.

Apr 17 2026
9th Cir. 3:24-cv-05260-GJL Unpublished

Kathy S. Miller v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of Social Security disability benefits, holding that the Administrative Law Judge did not abuse discretion in rejecting medical and lay testimony. The court found the ALJ properly applied the substantial evidence standard by weighing treatment duration, consistency with the record, and the claimant's insured status.