Skip to content
Do It For The Caselaw
  • Decisions
  • Broadcast
  • Topics
  • About
  • Shop
  • Subscribe
Do It For The Caselaw
  • Decisions
  • Broadcast
  • Topics
  • About
  • Shop
  • Subscribe
Home / Decisions / United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit / STAR SERVICES CORPORATION v. OWCP, et al
6th Cir.

STAR SERVICES CORPORATION v. OWCP, et al

April 17, 2026 ·25-3517 ·Published ·Clay · By Raj Patel

The Sixth Circuit affirmed an award of Black Lung Benefits Act benefits, holding that the employer failed to rebut the statutory presumption that a miner's death was caused by pneumoconiosis. The court found the administrative law judge's reliance on medical evidence establishing total disability and legal pneumoconiosis sufficient to meet the claimant's burden.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / 3:48
Download

Key takeaways

The employer failed to rebut the fifteen-year presumption that the miner's death was caused by pneumoconiosis because the medical evidence did not sufficiently disprove legal pneumoconiosis.

Linda Carol Christian, the widow of coal miner James Marshall Christian, filed a claim for benefits under the Black Lung Benefits Act after her husband died in 2019. Christian had worked underground in coal mines for thirty years. An administrative law judge awarded benefits, finding that Christian was totally disabled by a respiratory impairment and that the employer failed to rebut the statutory presumption that his death was caused by pneumoconiosis. The Benefits Review Board affirmed the award, and the employer, Star Services Corporation, petitioned the Sixth Circuit for review.

The court applied the substantial evidence standard, reviewing whether the administrative law judge's decision was supported by relevant evidence a reasonable mind might accept. First, the court addressed the invocation of the fifteen-year presumption, which applies when a miner has worked underground for fifteen years and is totally disabled. The employer argued the miner was not totally disabled, but the court found the administrative law judge's reliance on Dr. Jarboe's opinion and treatment records sufficient. These records showed the miner required frequent hospitalization and intubation for respiratory failure, which the court held constituted total disability even if the physician did not use the specific phrase 'totally disabled.' Second, the court addressed the employer's attempt to rebut the presumption. The employer had the burden to prove the miner did not have legal pneumoconiosis or that pneumoconiosis did not contribute to his death. The court found the employer's sole evidence, Dr. Jarboe's opinion, was insufficient because it failed to explain how the miner's exposure to coal dust did not contribute to his emphysema and respiratory failure. The administrative law judge was within his discretion to discredit this opinion for lacking reasoned explanation. Consequently, the employer failed to meet its burden to rebut the presumption.

The decision affirms the award of benefits to the surviving spouse, ensuring the continuation of financial support under the Black Lung Benefits Act. The ruling reinforces that employers must provide well-reasoned medical evidence to rebut the fifteen-year presumption, and that administrative law judges have broad discretion to weigh conflicting medical opinions. No remand instructions were issued as the petition was denied.

Play

Podcast (federal-narrative-summaries): Play in new window | Download

Civil Social Security

Share

Related from this court

Jul 17, 2026 United States of America v. Anthony Zigler Jul 17, 2026 United States v. Robertson Jul 17, 2026 Nader v. New York Life Insurance Company Jul 16, 2026 Espinoza-Reyes v. Blanche
Do It For The Caselaw

Just Do It For the Caselaw!

Site

  • Mission
  • The Anchors
  • Editorial Process
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Contact

Read & Listen

  • Decisions
  • Broadcast
  • Topics
  • The Weekly Brief

Follow

© 2026 Do It For The Caselaw. Not legal advice.