Background
D’Angelo Dominico Davis, proceeding pro se, appealed from the district court’s orders denying his motion for compassionate release under Section three thousand five hundred eighty-two subsection C paragraph one subsection A and a subsequent motion for reconsideration. The district court had previously denied his motions, concluding that the nature of the offense, his criminal and prison disciplinary history, his inadequate release plan, and the danger he poses to the community did not support relief.
The court’s reasoning
The panel reviewed the case for abuse of discretion. The court noted that compassionate release may be denied based on Section three thousand five hundred fifty-three factors alone. The district court did not abuse its discretion because Davis did not present any new information that altered the balance of those sentencing factors. Additionally, Davis failed to show any valid basis for reconsideration.
What it means going forward
This unpublished memorandum decision reinforces that district courts have discretion to deny compassionate release motions based on traditional sentencing factors without a separate finding on extraordinary and compelling circumstances, provided the defendant offers no new information to change the balance.
Podcast (federal-narrative-summaries): Play in new window | Download