Topic
Every decision we've filed under Summary Judgment.
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of 2B Claims Services. The court found that GoAuto Insurance's own actions were the cause of its alleged damages.
The Fifth Circuit affirmed the summary judgment in favor of TPUSA, Inc. The court found no genuine disputes of material fact in the discrimination and breach of contract claims.
The Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court's summary judgment in favor of the insurers. The court found no error in the application of the insurance policy exclusion and the fortuity doctrine.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Bankers Specialty Insurance Company. The court found that the plaintiff's claims were time-barred under the terms of the flood insurance policy.
The Seventh Circuit addressed the claim preclusion principles affecting a public employee's civil rights claims. The court affirmed in part and vacated in part the district court's summary judgment ruling.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Inverness Technologies. The court found that Barnett-Morgan failed to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination and that her claims of retaliation were not exhausted.
The Tenth Circuit dismissed an interlocutory appeal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The appeal involved a denial of a motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity.
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a pro se complaint alleging constitutional violations by two judges. The court held that the appellant abandoned his primary arguments and that the claims were meritless due to judicial immunity and established precedent.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court judgment granting summary judgment to BrowserStack. The appellate court held that the district court properly excluded Deque's damages evidence due to repeated failures to comply with discovery disclosure rules.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of qualified immunity to two San Francisco police inspectors who allegedly coerced a witness into fabricating evidence against a man later exonerated after thirty-two years in prison. The court held that a reasonable jury could find the officers violated the plaintiff's due process rights by threatening a young witness with an adult murder charge to secure a false statement.