11th Cir.

GOAUTO INSURANCE COMPANY v. 2B CLAIMS SERVICES INC

June 8, 2026 ·5:23-cv-00188-AW-MJF ·Unpublished ·HULL · By James Taylor

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of 2B Claims Services. The court found that GoAuto Insurance's own actions were the cause of its alleged damages.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / 0:47

Background

GoAuto Insurance Company hired 2B Claims Services to adjust claims from a car accident. After failing to settle claims within policy limits, GoAuto sued 2B for negligence, claiming it did not receive adequate advice regarding potential bad-faith exposure.

The court’s reasoning

The court reasoned that GoAuto could not succeed on its claims without showing that 2B’s conduct proximately caused its damages. The court concluded that GoAuto’s decision not to deliver checks by the deadline was the cause of its alleged damages, not any negligence on the part of 2B. Additionally, the court found that 2B had no duty to provide legal advice regarding bad-faith liability, as this was outside the scope of its role as a claims adjuster.

GoAuto’s own decision to insist on releases and not send the checks by December 14, not 2B’s conduct, thwarted the policy-limits settlement and caused the subsequent bad-faith claims.

What it means going forward

The ruling clarifies the responsibilities of claims adjusters and reinforces that insurers must act promptly to avoid bad-faith claims.