Apr 20 2026
9th Cir. 25-1953 Unpublished

Bazurto-Romo v. Blanche

The Ninth Circuit held that a petitioner's claim of derivative citizenship presents a genuine issue of material fact that cannot be resolved by the Board of Immigration Appeals. Consequently, the court transferred the case to the United States District Court for a de novo determination of the nationality claim.

Apr 20 2026
9th Cir. 3:14-cv-01092- Published

GESSELE, ET AL. V. JACK IN THE BOX INC.

The Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded a wage-and-hour judgment against Jack in the Box, holding that the district court erred in granting summary judgment on the willfulness of Workers' Benefit Fund overdeductions. The panel also ruled that the employer must pay for the full duration of shortened meal breaks under Oregon law and remanded the shoe deduction claims for a jury to determine if the deductions ultimately benefited employees.

Apr 17 2026
9th Cir. 9:23-cv-00151-KLD Unpublished

John Ambler; Stacy Ambler v. Flathead Conservation District; Friends of Montana Streams and Rivers Intervenor-Defendant

The Ninth Circuit affirmed that Montana lacks jurisdiction to enforce its 1975 Streambed Act against private landowners within Glacier National Park. The court held that because the United States acquired exclusive legislative jurisdiction in 1914, post-cession state statutes do not apply absent a same basic scheme exception.

Apr 17 2026
9th Cir. 9:23-cv-00151-KLD Unpublished

John Ambler; Stacy Ambler v. Flathead Conservation District; Friends of Montana Streams and Rivers

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment, holding that Montana lacks jurisdiction to enforce its 1975 Streambed Act against private inholdings within Glacier National Park. The court reasoned that because the United States acquired exclusive legislative jurisdiction over these lands in 1914, post-cession state statutes do not assimilate into federal law absent a same basic scheme.

Apr 17 2026
9th Cir. 3:22-cv-05499-TMC Unpublished

JONATHAN ADELSTEIN, relator and JESSICA BRUNELLE v. PEACEHEALTH, INC., a Washington nonprofit corporation; ROBERT AXELROD

The Ninth Circuit vacated summary judgment on a False Claims Act retaliation claim, ruling that an employer's refusal to renew a contract after an employee reported Medicaid fraud created a genuine dispute of material fact. The court held that a reasonable jury could find the nonrenewal was likely to deter protected activity and that the employer's stated reasons were pretextual.

Apr 17 2026
11th Cir. 9:23-cv-81262-RLR Published

KEVIN JOYCE v. FOREST RIVER, INC FREIGHTLINER CUSTOM CHASSIS CORPORATION

The Eleventh Circuit reversed summary judgment against Forest River, Inc. while affirming it against Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation in a Florida Lemon Law dispute. The court held that statutory presumptions regarding repair attempts are not mandatory requirements, creating a genuine issue of material fact for Forest River that precludes summary judgment.

Apr 17 2026
11th Cir. 1:20-cv-00502-TFM-N Per Curiam

ELNORIA HOWELL v. BALDWIN COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION EDDIE TYLER in his individual and official capacity as Superintendent of the Baldwin County Board of Education JENNIFER SINCLAIR

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed summary judgment for the Baldwin County Board of Education, holding that Elnoria Howell failed to prove race discrimination under Title VII. The court found no evidence of pretext or disparate treatment sufficient to support a reasonable inference of unlawful discrimination.

Apr 17 2026
10th Cir. 1:23-CV-02618-STV Panel Decision

Mazur v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Insurance Co.

The Tenth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for State Farm, holding that Colorado law requires an uninsured motorist's vehicle to be directly involved in an accident to trigger coverage. The court found that a pedestrian's independent decision to leave a broken-down vehicle and walk into a travel lane severed the causal chain between the vehicle's use and the resulting crash.

Apr 17 2026
6th Cir. 25-1986 Published

Triple Properties Detroit, LLC v. First American Title Insurance Company

The Sixth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for a title insurer, holding that the insurer properly denied coverage because the insured failed to act within a contractual deadline, causing its property rights to revert. The court ruled that the insured's deliberate inaction and subsequent sale of the property with known title defects fell squarely within a policy exclusion.