Apr 20 2026
9th Cir. 2:24-cv-00528-JR Unpublished

Martin v. Bisignano

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of Social Security disability benefits, ruling that the Administrative Law Judge's decision was supported by substantial evidence. The court held that the ALJ provided clear and convincing reasons to discount the claimant's subjective testimony regarding her symptoms.

Apr 17 2026
6th Cir. 25-3517 Published

STAR SERVICES CORPORATION v. OWCP, et al

The Sixth Circuit affirmed an award of Black Lung Benefits Act benefits, holding that the employer failed to rebut the statutory presumption that a miner's death was caused by pneumoconiosis. The court found the administrative law judge's reliance on medical evidence establishing total disability and legal pneumoconiosis sufficient to meet the claimant's burden.

Apr 17 2026
9th Cir. 3:24-cv-05260-GJL Unpublished

Kathy S. Miller v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of Social Security disability benefits, holding that the Administrative Law Judge did not abuse discretion in rejecting medical and lay testimony. The court found the ALJ properly applied the substantial evidence standard by weighing treatment duration, consistency with the record, and the claimant's insured status.

Apr 16 2026
11th Cir. 1:21-cv-24224-PCH Unpublished

BRYCE DUNHAM-ZEMBERI v. LINCOLN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the termination of long-term disability benefits, holding that the plan administrator did not abuse its discretion. The court ruled that the plaintiff failed to provide the specific objective medical evidence required by the plan to prove he remained unable to perform his job's material duties.

Apr 16 2026
9th Cir. 2:22-cv-00218-TOR Unpublished

Rose Nielsen v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

The Ninth Circuit reversed a district court's denial of attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, clarifying that judicial disagreement alone does not prove the government's position was substantially justified. The panel held that the district court erred by treating the ALJ's decision and a dissenting opinion as dispositive evidence of reasonableness when the agency's error had already been established on remand.

Apr 15 2026
10th Cir. 6:91-CR-10038-EFM-1) Panel Decision

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LORENZO MORALES

The Tenth Circuit reversed a district court's dismissal of a Rule 36 motion, holding that the original sentencing court retains exclusive authority to correct clerical errors in judgments regardless of probation transfers. The appellate panel remanded the case with instructions to evaluate the merits of the defendant's new evidence regarding his social security number.

Apr 15 2026
Fed. Cir. 26-1040 Panel Decision

ANTHONY M. AUGUSTA v. UNITED STATES

The Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of Anthony M. Augusta's complaint, holding that standalone due process claims do not provide a money-mandating source of law under the Tucker Act. The court further ruled that res judicata precluded his claims because they echoed issues previously litigated in his prior suits.