Jun 26 2026
10th Cir. 2:24-CV-02501-JAR-TJJ Panel Decision

Mitchell v. Haa, et al.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a land ownership dispute due to lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish either federal question or diversity jurisdiction.

Jun 23 2026
11th Cir. 5:25-cv-00360-MTT Per Curiam

Champa Dahi LLC v. Carlan

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed an appeal sua sponte due to a lack of jurisdiction. The court held that the district court's remand order was not appealable because it was based on a lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Jun 23 2026
11th Cir. 1:25-cv-04960-ELR Per Curiam

Solomon v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC

The Eleventh Circuit dismissed an appeal regarding a foreclosure sale because the property had already been sold while the case was pending. The court also ruled it lacked jurisdiction to review a future order that had not yet been entered when the notice of appeal was filed.

Jun 2 2026
11th Cir. 8:25-cv-01539-WFJ-AEP Panel Decision

Wells Fargo Bank v. Miles Christian Hart

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed an appeal regarding a foreclosure removal order because the court lacked jurisdiction to review it. The court carried with the case the separate issue of whether it has jurisdiction to review a subsequent order denying a motion for reconsideration.

May 29 2026
9th Cir. 2:21-cv-03349-JAK-PD Unpublished

SHAJI, ET AL. V. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., ET AL.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of a foreclosure dispute brought by pro se appellants. The panel held that the plaintiffs failed to allege sufficient facts to support claims for wrongful foreclosure, negligence, breach of contract, and related causes of action.

May 27 2026
4th Cir. 25-1884 Per Curiam

Frank Washington v. International Investments, LLC

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a trustee's claims regarding a cemetery on sold property. The court held that the plaintiff failed to state a claim under the relevant statute and did not allege a constitutionally protected property interest.