Topic
Every decision we've filed under Intellectual Property.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in a nonprecedential ruling. The three-judge panel issued a per curiam judgment without providing detailed reasoning.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed and remanded a Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision finding Google patents unpatentable. The court held that the prior art reference failed to disclose exchanging messages while a device remained in a low power mode.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the lower court's judgment in a nonprecedential ruling. The panel issued a per curiam decision without providing detailed reasoning.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dismissed the appeals in this intellectual property dispute. The parties agreed to the dismissal, with each side bearing its own costs.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision in a nonprecedential ruling. The court issued a per curiam judgment without providing detailed reasoning.
The Ninth Circuit ordered this case reheard en banc. The court vacated the prior three-judge panel opinion.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision rejecting patent claims for an automated kitchen system. The court held that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding that the claimed invention was obvious in light of prior art references.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. This nonprecedential ruling involved Zentian Ltd. and Apple Inc.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of Dr. Ahmad Aljindi's claims against the United States regarding alleged copyright infringement. The court ruled that the Claims Court lacked jurisdiction over the takings claims based on copyright infringement.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the trial court's ruling that claim eighteen of the patent was invalid due to obviousness. The court found that the use of a coating pan for heating the tablets was an obvious modification based on prior art.