9th Cir.

SEDLIK V. VON DRACHENBERG, ET AL.

June 9, 2026 ·2:21-cv-01102-DSF-MRW ·Published ·Chief Judge Murguia · By Maria Santos

The Ninth Circuit ordered this case reheard en banc. The court vacated the prior three-judge panel opinion.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / 1:12

Background

In this appeal, the Ninth Circuit issued an order directing that the case be reheard en banc.

The court’s reasoning

The order states that, upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, the case will be reheard en banc under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40(c) and Circuit Rule 40-3. The order also states that the prior three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40(c) and Circuit Rule 40-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Order at 1

What it means going forward

The panel decision no longer controls, and the full Ninth Circuit will reconsider the appeal.

Podcast 0:00 / 1:12