Topic
Every decision we've filed under Forfeiture / Penalty.
The Fifth Circuit affirmed the conviction of a defendant who pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a machinegun. The court held that the defendant failed to demonstrate plain error regarding the sufficiency of the plea colloquy and advisement on forfeiture and special assessments.
The Fifth Circuit affirmed a sentence enhancement for threatening to damage a building by explosive means. The court held that the defendant forfeited his objection to the enhancement by failing to file written objections or object at the sentencing hearing.
The Fifth Circuit denied a petition for review of an order dismissing an asylum appeal. The court held that the petitioners forfeited objections to defective notices to appear and failed to show persecution on account of a protected ground.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court order dismissing a civil rights complaint without prejudice. The appellate court held that the appellant forfeited the right to challenge the dismissal because his informal brief did not address the basis for the lower court's decision.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed a petition for review of an immigration order. The court found that the petitioner forfeited his arguments by failing to challenge dispositive findings regarding asylum and Convention Against Torture claims.
The Fourth Circuit affirmed Rami Mhana's convictions for money laundering and related crimes but reversed the district court's refusal to enter a forfeiture judgment. The appellate court held that forfeiture is mandatory under federal statute when the government meets specific prerequisites, regardless of restitution orders.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court dismissal of a pro se action alleging various claims against government entities. The appellate panel held that the plaintiffs' claims were wholly insubstantial and frivolous, failing to establish federal subject matter jurisdiction.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a Merit Systems Protection Board decision upholding a settlement agreement. The court held that the petitioner forfeited arguments regarding coercion and fraud by failing to raise them during the administrative proceedings.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied a petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals decision. The court found that the petitioner forfeited her claims by failing to meaningfully develop arguments regarding asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture relief.
The Ninth Circuit denied a petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals decision dismissing an immigrant's claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. The court affirmed the denial of cancellation of removal, finding substantial evidence supported the agency's conclusion that the petitioner's family would not suffer exceptional hardship.