Topic
Every decision we've filed under Forfeiture / Penalty.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dismissed an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims due to a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court found that the appellant forfeited the arguments he now raises by failing to present them in his opening brief to the Veterans Court.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied a petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order denying asylum. The court held that substantial evidence supported the agency's internal relocation finding and that the petitioner forfeited several challenges.
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the denial of disability benefits for Victor Gerard Guyton, II. The court held that the Administrative Law Judge's decision was supported by substantial evidence and that Guyton forfeited his arguments by failing to raise them with sufficient particularity in the district court.
The Fifth Circuit affirmed the convictions of two defendants involved in a healthcare fraud scheme targeting federal employees and private insurers. The court rejected challenges regarding sufficiency of evidence, prosecutorial conduct, and sentencing enhancements.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court order dismissing a civil rights complaint. The appellate court held that the appellant forfeited the right to appeal because his informal brief did not challenge the basis for the lower court's decision.
The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of a pro se civil complaint. The court held that the appellant forfeited her right to appellate review by failing to file specific objections to the magistrate judge's recommendation.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of a civil rights complaint. The court held that the appellant forfeited the right to appellate review by failing to file specific objections to the magistrate judge's recommendation.
The Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment because the plaintiff lacked contractual standing to sue under the insurance policies. However, the court vacated the denial of the motion to amend and remanded the case to allow the addition of new plaintiffs who may have standing.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal in this civil dispute over forfeiture penalties. The dismissal was granted by order of the parties under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure forty-two, subsection B.
The Tenth Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment for Toyota Motor Corporation because the appellant failed to preserve his sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenge by not filing a required post-verdict motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure fifty point one b.