Jul 8 2026
6th Cir. 25-1337 Published

United States v. Lark

The Sixth Circuit affirmed the conviction of a defendant charged with drug trafficking after he challenged the validity of search warrants and the speed of his trial. The court found that the affidavits supporting the warrants contained sufficient probable cause and that the district court properly excluded time from the speedy trial calculation.

Jul 8 2026
9th Cir. 1:24-cr-00003-JCC-1 Unpublished

United States v. Fejeran

The Ninth Circuit vacated and remanded a drug trafficking sentence because the district court failed to make explicit factual findings on disputed presentence report objections. The appellate court also found the district court erred by not providing sufficient reasons for denying safety-valve relief.

Jul 7 2026
8th Cir. 25-1490 Panel Decision

Carnes v. Blehm

The Eighth Circuit affirmed the denial of summary judgment against police detectives and a prosecutor in a civil rights suit alleging a reckless investigation and evidence suppression. The court held that genuine disputes of material fact exist regarding whether the defendants violated clearly established law by ignoring exculpatory evidence and coercing witnesses.

Jul 6 2026
1st Cir. 25-1079 Panel Decision

UNITED STATES v. JOAN ROSADO MALDONADO

The First Circuit vacated a federal sentence for a prohibited person in possession of a firearm, ruling that prior state drug convictions did not qualify as controlled substance offenses under federal sentencing guidelines. The court remanded the case for resentencing because the district court erred in calculating the defendant's base offense level.

Jul 6 2026
11th Cir. 7:22-cr-00058-HL-TQL-1 Published

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. EMORY AUSTIN CARTER

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed a mandatory minimum sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act for a defendant with prior Georgia cocaine distribution convictions. The court held that Georgia law does not criminalize cocaine isomers outside the federal schedule, so the state statute is not broader than federal law.