Topic
Every decision we've filed under Drug Trafficking.
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed a 36-month prison sentence for a supervised release violation, rejecting the defendant's claim that the sentence was substantively unreasonable. The court held that the district court properly weighed the severity of the defendant's drug violations and his lack of candor regarding his treatment plan.
The Tenth Circuit affirmed Mackenzie Becker's convictions for firearms and drug offenses, rejecting his argument that the search warrant affidavit failed to establish probable cause linking a road-rage incident to his residence. The court also dismissed Becker's Second Amendment challenge as foreclosed by existing Tenth Circuit precedent.
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed Rodrick Maurice Hamilton's conviction for conspiracy and attempt to commit Hobbs Act robbery following an armed shootout at a convenience store. The court rejected Hamilton's challenges to jury instructions on flight, prosecutorial comments on his silence, juror misconduct, and a sentencing Guidelines departure without notice.
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed Dickenson Elan's RICO conspiracy conviction and 135-month sentence, rejecting challenges to evidence admission and sufficiency of proof. The court held that the district court properly applied sentencing enhancements based on the total economic loss of the tax fraud scheme and did not abuse its discretion in imposing the sentence despite Elan's claims of hardship from future removal to Haiti.
The Tenth Circuit affirmed Brian Neil Wiggins's 192-month sentence, rejecting his claim that his prior Oregon second-degree assault conviction did not qualify as a crime of violence. The court held that Oregon law did not permit accomplice liability for negligence at the time of his 2008 conviction, ensuring the offense met the federal definition.
The Tenth Circuit affirmed a three-year prison sentence for a supervised release violation, ruling that a police report detailing firearm possession was admissible evidence. The court held that the report met the minimal reliability standard required for sentencing and that the defendant waived his right to object to the timing of its disclosure.
The Third Circuit affirmed Jerome Brown's conviction and sentence, ruling that while the District Court improperly participated in plea negotiations, the error was harmless. Brown failed to demonstrate that the judicial interference violated his substantial rights or resulted in a heavier sentence than he would have otherwise accepted.
The Seventh Circuit affirmed a defendant's sentence after he failed to object to a revised sentencing guideline calculation that applied a higher drug conversion ratio to THC-infused edibles. The court held that the district court acted within its discretion to permit a late government objection to the presentence report and that the defendant waived his substantive argument regarding the conversion ratio by agreeing to the revised calculation.
The Sixth Circuit affirmed LaVaughn Odom's 192-month sentence for drug trafficking and firearm offenses, ruling that the district court did not commit procedural or substantive error. The court held that the sentence was reasonable despite being below the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines range.
The Third Circuit affirmed Quaheem Bethea's 70-month sentence for felon-in-possession of a firearm, rejecting claims that the District Court failed to adequately consider his youth and impulse control. The court held that the sentencing judge's detailed discussion of Bethea's persistent criminal history satisfied the requirement to consider all relevant factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).