May 6 2026
5th Cir. 25-40621 Panel Decision

United States v. Newby

The Fifth Circuit dismissed a federal prisoner's application for a certificate of appealability because the issues raised did not involve the denial of a constitutional right. The court clarified that procedural questions regarding successive habeas motions cannot bypass statutory restrictions on second-or-successive petitions.

May 5 2026
4th Cir. 24-1706 Unanimous

Josh Malone v. United States Patent and Trademark Office

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court judgment granting summary judgment to the Patent and Trademark Office, holding that draft decisions and related emails circulated among administrative patent judges are protected from disclosure under the deliberative process privilege of the Freedom of Information Act.

May 5 2026
7th Cir. 25-3050 Panel Decision

Margarito Castañon-Nava v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al

The Seventh Circuit affirmed a district court order extending a consent decree by one hundred eighteen days due to substantial noncompliance by immigration officials. The court reversed in part the lower court's order releasing hundreds of potential class members, holding that the government's mandatory detention authority under Section twelve hundred twenty-five does not apply to noncitizens unlawfully present within the United States.

May 4 2026
10th Cir. 24-2132 Panel Decision

United States v. Orrantia

The Tenth Circuit affirmed the conviction of a Customs and Border Protection officer who was found guilty of depriving a traveler of his rights and falsifying records. The court rejected the officer's due process claim that the government violated his rights by deleting a video of a separate incident under its standard retention policy.

May 4 2026
10th Cir. 1:25-CV-01184-LTB-RTG Panel Decision

Rios v. Ensey, et al.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability to a state prisoner challenging the timeliness of his federal habeas petition. The court found the petitioner failed to demonstrate that reasonable jurists would debate the district court's procedural ruling that his claim was time-barred.

May 4 2026
4th Cir. 25-1514 Per Curiam

ESTATE OF KATHERINE MONICA VICKERS, Rupa Vickers Russe as the Executor of the Estate and RUPA VICKERS RUSSE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court judgment dismissing a Federal Tort Claims Act lawsuit against the Department of Veterans Affairs. The appellate court held that the plaintiff's claims were time-barred and that her gender discrimination claim was unexhausted.