Topic
Every decision we've filed under Civil.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied a petition for review of Board of Immigration Appeals decisions regarding asylum and protection claims. The court found the agency's determinations supported by substantial evidence and the motion to reopen properly denied.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed a dismissal order regarding two plaintiffs who entered sensitive payment information on retail websites. The court held that the surreptitious recording of complete credit card numbers by session replay code constitutes a concrete injury analogous to the common-law tort of intrusion upon seclusion.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied petitions for review of Board of Immigration Appeals decisions regarding asylum, withholding of removal, Convention Against Torture protection, and a motion to reopen.
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed a district court dismissal of a lawsuit challenging Georgia's voter list maintenance. The court held that plaintiffs lacked Article III standing because their alleged injury was a generalized grievance shared by all voters.
The Eighth Circuit affirmed a district court's dismissal of a long-term care insurance dispute. The court held that the policy did not cover losses that existed before the coverage effective date.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied a petition for review of an immigration order. The court found substantial evidence supported the lower court's conclusion that the petitioner failed to establish a reasonable fear of persecution or torture.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision in a labor dispute involving freight and delivery companies. The panel found no reversible error after reviewing the parties' briefs and the record.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a prisoner's access-to-courts claim but reversed the dismissal of his First Amendment legal mail claim. The court held that the prisoner adequately alleged a violation of his right to confidential communication with counsel.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court judgment dismissing a plaintiff's diversity action against an insurance company. The appellate panel held that the district court properly exercised subject matter jurisdiction and granted judgment on the pleadings based on the insurance policy terms.
The Sixth Circuit affirmed a summary judgment ruling in a premises-liability case where a plaintiff slipped on oil in a parking lot. The court held that the plaintiff's self-contradictory testimony failed to create a genuine dispute of material fact regarding whether the store had notice of the hazard.