Jul 15 2026
10th Cir. 2:24-CV-02387-TC-ADM Panel Decision

Hulett v. Foster, et al.

The Tenth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of a pro se plaintiff's civil rights claims due to service of process defects and failure to state a claim. The court also upheld the denial of the plaintiff's motions for extensions of time to appeal under Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure four and six.

Jul 15 2026
9th Cir. 20-72048 Unpublished

Coseme Damian Moradel-Calix v. Todd Blanche

The Ninth Circuit denied a petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals decision rejecting an asylum claim. The court found substantial evidence supported the agency's determination that the petitioner failed to prove past or future persecution on account of a protected ground.

Jul 15 2026
9th Cir. 22-2032 Unpublished

Zavalza-Uribe v. Blanche

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied a petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals decision. The court found the petition untimely and affirmed the agency's denial of a motion to reopen a cancellation of removal application.

Jul 15 2026
4th Cir. 25-1682 Panel Decision

Golden Corral Corp. v. Illinois Union Insurance Company

The Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's denial of a motion to reopen a final judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure sixty point B six. The court held that a subsequent state supreme court ruling on similar facts did not constitute extraordinary circumstances sufficient to overcome the principle of finality.

Jul 15 2026
9th Cir. 25-2073 Published

RELATOR, LLC v. ERSKINE

The Ninth Circuit reversed a district court dismissal of a False Claims Act qui tam action involving Paycheck Protection Program loans. The court held that the public disclosure bar did not apply and that the district court abused its discretion in denying leave to amend the complaint.

Jul 15 2026
5th Cir. 23-60269 Per Curiam

Walters v. Blanche

The Fifth Circuit denied a petition for review challenging an immigration judge's determination that the petitioner was removable due to an aggravated felony conviction. The court held that the petitioner's mail fraud convictions involved a loss exceeding ten thousand dollars, satisfying the statutory definition of an aggravated felony.

Jul 15 2026
9th Cir. 1:23-cv-00271-SASP-WRP Unpublished

Nolan v. Porter Kiakona Kopper, LLP

The Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court ruling that a law firm's counter-complaint filed solely with opposing counsel did not violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The court also upheld the dismissal of an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, finding no outrageous conduct by the defendant.