Feb 13 2025
2nd Cir. 22-1377 Panel Decision

Hoffer v. Tellone

The Second Circuit clarified that sanctions for lost electronic evidence under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(e)(2) require a specific finding of intent to deprive the opponent of that information. The court rejected the application of a lesser negligence standard, affirming the district court's denial of an adverse inference instruction in a civil rights excessive force case.

Feb 12 2025
9th Cir. 23-1745 Published

Lapadat v. Bondi

The Ninth Circuit granted the Lapadats' petition for review and remanded their asylum case, holding that the Board of Immigration Appeals erred by disregarding credible testimony of past persecution. The panel further ruled that the record compels a finding that the Roma are a disfavored group in Romania.

Feb 11 2025
9th Cir. 3:22-cv-00244- Published

K. J., a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem, Kasey L. Johnson v. Doctor LAMONT A. JACKSON

The Ninth Circuit reversed summary judgment, holding that school officials violated a high school student's due process rights by extending his suspension based on new charges without providing notice or a hearing. The court further ruled that the officials are not entitled to qualified immunity and that the student has standing to seek expungement of the disciplinary records.

Feb 10 2025
9th Cir. 23-4240 Unanimous

Luis Alberto Perez-Perez; M.E.P.-B.; Aury Fabiola Barrera-Godoy; M.N.P.-B v. Pamela Bondi, Attorney General

The Ninth Circuit held that listing family members by their agency "A" numbers in a petition for review satisfies the Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure requirement to name all parties. The court rejected the government's request to amend the caption, ruling that "A" numbers provide sufficient notice of identity without foreclosing meritorious claims on technicalities.

Feb 5 2025
2nd Cir. 23-634 Panel Decision

Xerox Corp. v. Local 14A, Rochester Reg'l Joint Bd.

The Second Circuit vacated a district court ruling that denied arbitration of a dispute over retiree benefits, holding that the collective bargaining agreement contained language reasonably susceptible to interpretation as vesting benefits beyond the contract's expiration. The court remanded the case to allow a trier of fact to resolve the ambiguity regarding the parties' intent, particularly in light of conflicting reservation-of-rights clauses.

Feb 4 2025
2nd Cir. 22-3097 Panel Decision

Schansman v. Sberbank of Russia PJSC

The Second Circuit held that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act's commercial activity exception applies to claims brought under the Anti-Terrorism Act, abrogating sovereign immunity for a Russian state-owned bank. The court further ruled for the first time that the ATA's immunity provisions cover foreign state instrumentalities, not just agencies.

Jan 23 2025
2nd Cir. 22-1854 Panel Decision

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. RALPH BILLINGTON, MICHAEL ACEVES, AND SHARON DORMAN v. HCL TECHNOLOGIES LTD. AND HCL AMERICA, INC

The Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a qui tam action alleging that HCL Technologies violated the False Claims Act by using cheaper visas and underpaying foreign workers. The court held that the relators failed to plausibly allege a reverse FCA violation because no established legal obligation existed to pay higher taxes or visa fees that the defendant never actually incurred.

Jan 21 2025
9th Cir. 1:15-cv-00321- Published

G.P.P., INC., doing business as Guardian Innovative Solutions v. GUARDIAN PROTECTION PRODUCTS, INC.; RPM WOOD FINISHES GROUP, INC

The Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court's award of over $4 million in attorney's fees to G.P.P., Inc. but reversed the denial of fees to RPM Wood Finishes Group regarding abandoned claims. The panel held that a plaintiff's failure to litigate claims does not constitute a voluntary dismissal under California law without clear, express notice to the court.

Jan 14 2025
9th Cir. 4:23-cv-01196- Published

TANGLE, INC v. ARITZIA, INC.; ARITZIA LP; UNITED STATES OF ARITZIA, INC

The Ninth Circuit reversed the dismissal of a copyright claim involving kinetic sculptures, holding that their ability to assume multiple poses does not prevent them from being fixed in a tangible medium. However, the court affirmed the dismissal of a trade dress claim because the plaintiff failed to provide adequate notice of the specific elements of the alleged trade dress.