Jul 13 2026
5th Cir. 25-40508 Per Curiam

Lambert v. City of Onalaska, Texas

The Fifth Circuit affirmed a district court grant of summary judgment in a civil rights suit brought by a parent against a school resource officer. The court held that the officer had probable cause to stop and arrest the parent for disobeying a lawful order and resisting arrest, and that the parent failed to prove a retaliatory arrest exception.

Jul 13 2026
9th Cir. 2:24-cv-05152-SVW-JPR Unpublished

Brown, et al. v. Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, et al.

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a civil antitrust action brought by an individual and his company against a municipal water department. The court held that the corporate appellant failed to retain counsel as required by local rules and that the individual plaintiff lacked standing to sue on behalf of the corporation.

Jul 13 2026
5th Cir. 25-20409 Per Curiam

Dennis v. State of Texas

The Fifth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of Jeffery James Dennis's complaint regarding a property foreclosure. The court held that the district court correctly rejected claims based on a flawed understanding of Uniform Commercial Code filings.

Jul 13 2026
5th Cir. 25-50951 Per Curiam

Riddle v. X Corp.

The Fifth Circuit affirmed a district court's dismissal of a copyright infringement case due to the plaintiff's repeated misconduct. The appellate court found the lower court did not abuse its discretion in imposing dismissal with prejudice after warnings were ignored.

Jul 13 2026
9th Cir. 3:24-cv-00721-TWR-DDL Unpublished

Mirch v. United States

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of a taxpayer's claim for unauthorized collection activities. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to exhaust administrative remedies and that their suit was time-barred.

Jul 10 2026
4th Cir. 26-1312 Per Curiam

In re CLARENCE HICKS, JR

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed in part and denied in part a petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Clarence Hicks, Jr. The court found the request to compel a ruling moot and determined that mandamus relief was not available to lift a grant of indefinite leave to reply.