Topic
Every decision we've filed under Administrative / Agency Review.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied a petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Solomon Thomas. The court found that the district court had recently taken significant action on Thomas's motion to compel agency action.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal filed by Larry James Tyler. The court ruled that the notice of appeal was not filed within the required thirty-day window.
The Seventh Circuit reversed a district court ruling that held Allstate Insurance Company vicariously liable for TCPA violations committed by a subcontracted telemarketer. The court affirmed the denial of class certification but found that the plaintiff failed to prove an agency relationship sufficient to bind the insurer to the telemarketer's actions.
The Seventh Circuit reversed a district court ruling that held Allstate Insurance Company vicariously liable for telemarketing calls made by a subcontractor. The court affirmed the denial of class certification but found that the plaintiff failed to prove an agency relationship between Allstate and the telemarketer.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed a district court dismissal of a civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The panel found no basis for reversal after reviewing the record and the parties' arguments.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal challenging a district court order remanding a case to state court. The court held that such remand orders are generally not reviewable under federal statute.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed an appeal filed by pro se plaintiffs challenging a district court's orders on sanctions and attorney fees. The court held that the appealed orders were not final because they did not determine the specific amounts owed.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dismissed an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims due to a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court found that the appellant forfeited the arguments he now raises by failing to present them in his opening brief to the Veterans Court.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dismissed a petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board. The dismissal occurred because the petitioner failed to pay the required docketing fee and file the mandatory discrimination statement.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court also upheld the denial of a motion to intervene because the underlying case was terminated.