Every decision we've summarized — searchable, filterable, neutral.

Apr 28 2026
5th Cir. 25-30192 Per Curiam

United States of America v. Julius Augillard

The Fifth Circuit affirmed Julius Augillard's 70-month sentence, ruling that his prior state conviction qualified as a controlled substance offense under the realistic probability test. However, the court vacated part of the judgment because the district court failed to orally pronounce a discretionary supervised release condition that appeared in the written order.

Apr 28 2026
United States Court… 25-1104 Panel Decision

EVERGREEN SHIPPING AGENCY (AMERICA) CORP. AND EVERGREEN LINE JOINT SERVICE AGREEMENT v. FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

The D.C. Circuit denied Evergreen Shipping's petition for review, upholding the Federal Maritime Commission's order that detention charges levied during a port closure were unjust and unreasonable. The court affirmed that the Commission reasonably applied the Shipping Act's incentive principle to conclude that fees cannot promote freight fluidity when equipment cannot physically be returned.

Apr 28 2026
3rd Cir. 24-2740 Panel Decision

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AARON LYONS

The Third Circuit affirmed the dismissal of Aaron Lyons's habeas petition, ruling that his claim based on the Supreme Court's Rehaif decision was procedurally defaulted. The court held that the legal argument regarding knowledge of conviction status was reasonably available when Lyons pleaded guilty, and he failed to demonstrate actual innocence to excuse the default.

Apr 28 2026
11th Cir. 2:20-cv-01058-RAH-SMD Per Curiam

Terry v. Robinett

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the denial of Stacy Terry's motions to vacate a prior judgment, ruling that she failed to prove the underlying decision was void. The court held that Terry's arguments regarding counsel conflicts and misidentified defendants were meritless and had already been rejected on direct appeal.

Apr 28 2026
6th Cir. 23-3645 Published

Apogee Coal Co. v. Director, OWCP

The Sixth Circuit denies petitions for review, affirming that Arch Resources remains liable for black lung benefits under the Black Lung Benefits Act despite selling its subsidiary in 2005. The court holds that because the petitioners conceded their arguments were identical to those rejected in a 2024 published decision, the prior ruling binds the panel and precludes relief.

Apr 28 2026
5th Cir. 25-11133 Per Curiam

United States v. Diaz, Jr.

The Fifth Circuit granted an appointed attorney's motion to withdraw and dismissed the defendant's appeal after finding no nonfrivolous issues for review. The court concurred with the attorney's assessment that the case lacked arguable grounds for reversal under the *Anders* standard.

Apr 28 2026
4th Cir. 25-6963 Per Curiam

TONY BRYAN SMITH v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

The Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed Tony Bryan Smith's habeas appeal because he failed to meet the statutory requirements for challenging a procedural dismissal. The court found that Smith did not demonstrate that the district court's ruling on the successive nature of his petition was debatable or that he substantially showed a denial of a constitutional right.

Apr 28 2026
9th Cir. 20-71287 Unpublished

RAFAEL RODRIGUEZ ZARAGOZA V. TODD BLANCHE

The Ninth Circuit dismissed a petition for review of a BIA denial of cancellation of removal, holding it lacked jurisdiction over discretionary hardship determinations and factual findings. The court further rejected a claim regarding a defective Notice to Appear because the petitioner failed to exhaust the argument before the agency.

Apr 28 2026
1st Cir. 25-1857 Panel Decision

ELIZABETH PUTNAM; CALE PUTNAM v. EPR PROPERTIES; PREMIER PARKS, LLC

The First Circuit reversed the dismissal of a wrongful death claim against Premier Parks, LLC, finding that public statements and operational intermingling created a genuine dispute regarding personal jurisdiction. Conversely, the court affirmed the dismissal against EPR Properties, ruling that the plaintiffs failed to provide evidence linking the real estate trust to the hotel's marketing or booking activities in Massachusetts.