Every decision we've summarized — searchable, filterable, neutral.

May 29 2026
5th Cir. 25-50344 Per Curiam

United States v. Garraway

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the conviction of Mark Owen Garraway for transporting illegal aliens. The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's finding that Garraway knew the individuals were aliens.

May 29 2026
9th Cir. 2:24-cv-01834-CDS-NJK Unpublished

Catamount Properties 2018, LLC v. Selassie

The Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court order declaring a litigant vexatious and imposing a pre-filing review order. The court dismissed the portion of the appeal challenging the remand of the case to state court due to lack of appellate jurisdiction.

May 29 2026
11th Cir. 2:24-cv-00704-SPC-KCD Per Curiam

Sheets v. Jimenez

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a pro se plaintiff's First Amendment claims against police officers and a Florida municipality. The court held that the plaintiff failed to allege sufficient facts to support claims of viewpoint discrimination or municipal liability for failure to train.

May 29 2026
6th Cir. 25-3808 Unanimous

Lonergan v. Gallagher Sharp, LLP

The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of a complaint alleging disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act because the plaintiff failed to plead specific facts regarding proposed reasonable accommodations.

May 29 2026
8th Cir. 25-1338 Panel Decision

Lopez-Vasquez v. Blanche

The Eighth Circuit denied a petition for review of a removal order against an undocumented immigrant who sought cancellation of removal. The court held that the petitioner had no due process right to discretionary relief and that the Board of Immigration Appeals acted within its authority in finding no exceptional hardship.

May 29 2026
11th Cir. 25-13631 Published

Citadel Securities LLC v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied a petition for review challenging the Securities and Exchange Commission's approval of a new options trading platform. The court upheld the Commission's finding that latency arbitrage harms the options market and that the proposed speed-bump technology effectively targets such predatory trading.