Every decision we've summarized — searchable, filterable, neutral.

Mar 20 2026
3rd Cir. 26-1019 Panel Decision

In re SHARISSE JUANITA FILUS, as Trustee and/or Beneficiary of the SJF Living Revocable Trust

The Third Circuit denied in part and dismissed in part a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Sharisse Filus seeking to intervene in her underlying civil action against Fidelity Investments. The court determined that the District Court's procedural rulings, including the denial of Filus's motions to strike the defendant's answer and impose sanctions, were not appropriate subjects for mandamus relief.

Mar 20 2026
11th Cir. 8:25-cv-00404-MSS-AEP Per Curiam

Bruce v. U.S. Bank National Association

The Eleventh Circuit vacated a district court's dismissal of a foreclosure lawsuit, ruling that the lower court erred by applying the Rooker-Feldman doctrine to the entire case without analyzing individual claims. The appellate court held that the plaintiffs' complaint sufficiently alleged federal question jurisdiction through specific statutory violations.

Mar 19 2026
4th Cir. 23-1854 Panel Decision

D.C., by his parents and guardians, Trevor Chaplick and Vivian Chaplick v. FAIRFAX COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD

The Fourth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a systemic IDEA lawsuit, holding that plaintiffs failed to exhaust administrative remedies, had duplicative litigation pending, and lacked standing. The court rejected arguments that administrative exhaustion was futile due to alleged systemic bias in Virginia's hearing officer system.

Mar 19 2026
5th Cir. 25-10770 Per Curiam

United States v. Morgan

The Fifth Circuit granted the Federal Public Defender's motion to withdraw from representing Deray Eugene Morgan after finding no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. The court dismissed the defendant's criminal appeal following a review of the record and the counsel's Anders brief.

Mar 19 2026
5th Cir. 25-50894 Per Curiam

Daniels v. LAZ Parking

The Fifth Circuit reversed a district court's dismissal of a pro se plaintiff's Title VII racial discrimination lawsuit, holding that his complaint adequately alleged hostile work environment and retaliation claims. The court emphasized that pro se pleadings must be liberally construed and need not meet the strict standards of formal legal drafting to survive a motion to dismiss.