10th Cir.

Spitz v. Starr Indemnity & Liability Company

Spitz v. Starr Indemnity & Liability Company

June 10, 2026 ·25-6074 ·Panel Decision ·Carolyn B. McHugh · By Raj Patel

The Tenth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a bad faith insurance claim brought by an assignee of an insured. The court held that Oklahoma law governed the dispute and barred the assignment of the claim.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / --:--

Background

Randy Spitz, as assignee of Nancy Aguilar and Real Trucking, Inc., sued Starr Indemnity & Liability Company for bad faith and negligence after Starr paid only the policy limit in an underlying Oklahoma accident. Starr moved to transfer venue from the Northern District of Illinois to the Western District of Oklahoma and sought dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure twelve comma C. The district court granted the transfer and dismissed the claims, finding Oklahoma law applied and prohibited the assignment of the bad faith claim.

The court’s reasoning

The court reviewed the choice-of-law decision de novo, applying Illinois’s most significant relationship test. It found that the place of injury was neutral, the conduct causing injury occurred in Oklahoma, the domicile of parties was a wash, and the relationship was centered in Oklahoma due to the underlying litigation. Consequently, Oklahoma law governed. The court also held it lacked jurisdiction to review the venue transfer order from the Northern District of Illinois because the transferee court had not issued a ruling on a motion to retransfer.

What it means going forward

Insurers in Oklahoma may successfully defend against bad faith claims brought by assignees of insureds, as such assignments are prohibited under state law.