Background
Richard Thistlethwaite worked for Pace Air Freight, Inc. from 1999 until his termination in 2021. He claimed the company interfered with and retaliated against his use of Family and Medical Leave Act leave. Pace terminated him citing his failure to provide security camera passwords and the falsification of mileage reports. The district court granted summary judgment to Pace, ruling that Thistlethwaite could not prove the stated reasons were pretextual.
The court’s reasoning
The court reviewed the grant of summary judgment de novo and applied the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework. The court skipped to the third step, focusing on whether Thistlethwaite could show pretext. The court found that Thistlethwaite’s testimony regarding the security cameras was inconsistent and insufficient to create a genuine dispute of fact. Similarly, his explanation for falsified mileage reports lacked specificity and corroboration. The court also noted that the investigation into his mileage began before he requested leave, undercutting claims of retaliation.
We agree there is no genuine dispute of material fact with respect to pretext.
What it means going forward
Employers may rely on documented, non-retaliatory reasons for termination even when an employee is on medical leave, provided the employee cannot produce evidence that those reasons are pretextual.
Podcast (federal-narrative-summaries): Play in new window | Download
