6th Cir.

Griffin v. Copper Cellar Corporation

May 5, 2026 ·25-5786 ·Published ·Karen Nelson Moore · By James Taylor

The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed a jury verdict awarding compensatory damages and attorney fees to an employee who suffered severe sexual harassment. The court rejected the employer's arguments that the damages were unsupported by evidence or that the fee award was excessive.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / --:--

Background

Rose Griffin sued her employer, Copper Cellar Corporation, alleging a hostile work environment and retaliation under Title VII. A jury found in her favor on the hostile work environment claim but not on the retaliation claim. The jury awarded Griffin one hundred seventy-nine thousand dollars in compensatory damages and three hundred fourteen dollars and twenty-two cents in back pay. The district court also approved four hundred eighty thousand dollars and thirty-six cents in attorney fees. Copper Cellar appealed, challenging the back pay award, the compensatory damages, and the reasonableness of the attorney fees.

The court’s reasoning

The court affirmed the back pay award, noting that Sixth Circuit precedent does not require a finding of discriminatory discharge to support back pay in a hostile work environment case. Regarding compensatory damages, the court found the evidence of severe emotional distress, including nightmares, physical harassment, and a near-suicide attempt, sufficient to support the award and not excessive. On attorney fees, the court held that the plaintiff’s recovery of one hundred seventy-nine thousand dollars was not less favorable than the employer’s settlement offer of twenty-five thousand dollars, so the fees were not subject to reduction.

The jury heard testimony . . . about the substantial negative physical and emotional effects [Griffin] suffered, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in rejecting the argument that the jury’s award was out of proportion to her suffering.

Griffin v. Copper Cellar Corp., 26a0205n.06 (6th Cir. 2026)

What it means going forward

The decision reinforces that severe emotional distress evidence, including physical harassment and suicidal ideation, can support significant compensatory damages in Title VII hostile work environment cases even without a finding of wrongful termination.

Play